SULTAN AHMAD vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI — Cr.M.P./715/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 138,NI,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010061052026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./4075/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./715/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCHANTILE LAW ( 150 )

Sub-Category

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 138,NI,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SULTAN AHMAD

    Adv. KRIPA SHANKAR NANDA,SHREYA TIWARY,SHREYA TIWARY, ,NIRANJAN KR SINHA,SHREYA TIWARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI

  2. 2.VIKASH KUMAR GORAI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.715 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No.2 in petitioner Sultan Ahmad's criminal miscellaneous petition. The petitioner was directed to file requisites for service of notice via speed post and court process within one week, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks, with the case to be listed after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./715/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.715 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party No.2 in petitioner Sultan Ahmad's criminal miscellaneous petition. The petitioner was directed to file requisites for service of notice via speed post and court process within one week, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks, with the case to be listed after receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case