SOFIYA AASHIFULLAH SHEIKH @ SUFIA SHAIKH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — Cr.M.P./1235/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 316(2),318(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010060652026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./4050/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1235/2026
Registration Date
23-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Cancilation Of Bail ( 22 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SOFIYA AASHIFULLAH SHEIKH @ SUFIA SHAIKH
Adv. AJIT KUMAR, ,TRISHNA SAGAR,VIKESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA
-
2.AYESHA KHATOON
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to Ayesha Khatoon. The bail had been granted based on a compromise between the parties. While the petitioner claimed bail conditions were violated, the court found no cogent grounds for cancellation, as none of the statutory criteria (such as criminal misuse, witness tampering, or fleeing) were established. The petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
01-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./1235/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to Ayesha Khatoon. The bail had been granted based on a compromise between the parties. While the petitioner claimed bail conditions were violated, the court found no cogent grounds for cancellation, as none of the statutory criteria (such as criminal misuse, witness tampering, or fleeing) were established. The petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts