MD. LATIF ANSARI @ MD.LATIF vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA, ,AGNIVESH,SOURAV KUMAR — Cr.A(SJ)/211/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 452,354B,379,504,506,34,IPC,3(1)(d),3(1)(v),3(2)(va),3(1)(z),SC,ST,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010060072026
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/4014/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/211/2026
Registration Date
28-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )
Sub-Category
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MD. LATIF ANSARI @ MD.LATIF
Adv. NAVEEN KUMAR JAISWAL,NUTAN KUMARI SHARMA,NUTAN KUMARI SHARMA, ,NUTAN KUMARI SHARMA
-
2.SADDAM ANSARI @ MD. SADDAM
-
3.MD. AZAD ANSARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA, ,AGNIVESH,SOURAV KUMAR
-
2.VICTIM X
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
Summary of Cr.A(SJ) /211/2026 The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appeal of three appellants charged under IPC sections and SC/ST (PoA) Act provisions in a tempo theft case. The court directed the appellants to surrender within four weeks and granted bail at Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, finding the case essentially concerned alleged theft rather than substantive atrocities, while imposing conditions including submission of Aadhaar copies and maintenance of active mobile numbers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/211/2026
Summary of Cr.A(SJ) /211/2026 The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appeal of three appellants charged under IPC sections and SC/ST (PoA) Act provisions in a tempo theft case. The court directed the appellants to surrender within four weeks and granted bail at Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, finding the case essentially concerned alleged theft rather than substantive atrocities, while imposing conditions including submission of Aadhaar copies and maintenance of active mobile numbers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts