ASHOK YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — JHHC10058972026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010058972026

Filing Number

WPC/1958/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK YADAV

    Adv. BABAN PRASAD,AKHOURI PRAKHAR SINHA,AKHOURI PRAKHAR SINHA, ,AMAN KEDIA,AKHOURI PRAKHAR SINHA

  2. 2.SITA RAM YADAV

  3. 3.BHIMSEN YADAV

  4. 4.CHHATHU YADAV

  5. 5.PREM LAL YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR

  2. 2.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR

  3. 3.THE CIRCLE OFFICER

  4. 4.KEDAN YADAV

  5. 5.RAVI YADAV

  6. 6.JAGO YADAV

  7. 7.SHIBU YADAV

  8. 8.SURENDRA YADAV

  9. 9.DILO YADAV

  10. 10.UDAY YADAV

  11. 11.CHAMARI YADAV

  12. 12.ARUN YADAV

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 1958 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, petitioners Ashok Yadav and others challenged state authorities regarding land/administrative matters. On 10 June 2026, the court noted that all procedural defects in the petition had been cured. The court directed the office to verify compliance and proceed with substantive hearing of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 1958 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, petitioners Ashok Yadav and others challenged state authorities regarding land/administrative matters. On 10 June 2026, the court noted that all procedural defects in the petition had been cured. The court directed the office to verify compliance and proceed with substantive hearing of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case