PRIYAM SHRIVASTAVA vs BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY THROUGH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR Advocate - SRIJIT CHOUDHARY — JHHC10058852026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010058852026

Filing Number

WPC/1953/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRIYAM SHRIVASTAVA

    Adv. SUMEET GADODIA,ANISH LAL,ANISH LAL, ,NILLOHIT CHOUBEY,MS. SHRUTI SHEKHAR,PRAKHAR HARIT,SANYA KUMARI,RANJEET KUSHWAHA,NIDHI LALL,ANISH LAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY THROUGH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR Advocate - SRIJIT CHOUDHARY

  2. 2.DEAN, BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

  3. 3.REGISTRAR, BIRLA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court found the writ petition defective and unregistered. The court granted the petitioner three weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being treated as never filed, with no further proceedings before the bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court found the writ petition defective and unregistered. The court granted the petitioner three weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being treated as never filed, with no further proceedings before the bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case