SADHANA SARDE ALLIAS SUDHA SARDE vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN — B.A./3693/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 304(B),34, 302/34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010057402026

Filing Number

B.A./3829/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

B.A./3693/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 304(B),34, 302/34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SADHANA SARDE ALLIAS SUDHA SARDE

    Adv. NEHA BHARDWAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the bail application of Sadhana Sarde, who has been in custody since August 2023 for charges under IPC Sections 304B, 34, and 120B. The court declined to enlarge her on bail, noting that her previous bail application was rejected and the trial is at final stage with 4 prosecution and 6 defence witnesses already examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3693/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the bail application of Sadhana Sarde, who has been in custody since August 2023 for charges under IPC Sections 304B, 34, and 120B. The court declined to enlarge her on bail, noting that her previous bail application was rejected and the trial is at final stage with 4 prosecution and 6 defence witnesses already examined. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case