BIJAY PANDEY ALIAS BIJAY KUMAR PANDEY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — Cr.M.P./700/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 498A,302,323,504,506,IPC,3/4,DP,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: JHHC010057312026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./3821/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./700/2026

Registration Date

18-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )

Sub-Category

Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 498A,302,323,504,506,IPC,3/4,DP,ACT

Petitioner(s)

BIJAY PANDEY ALIAS BIJAY KUMAR PANDEY

Adv. PEEYUSH KRISHNA CHOUDHARY,AMRIT ANUNAY,AMRIT ANUNAY, ,BHANU KUMAR No.1,AMRIT ANUNAY

MEENA DEVI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

12-03-2026

LAWAZIMA

23-03-2026

Fresh Filing (Admission)

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition by Bijay Pandey and Meena Devi challenging a non-bailable arrest warrant issued against them for alleged offences including murder (Section 302) and dowry-related cruelty (Section 498A). The court found the Magistrate's warrant order lawful, as the petitioners stood accused of serious non-bailable offences and were evading arrest despite eight police raids on their residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition by Bijay Pandey and Meena Devi challenging a non-bailable arrest warrant issued against them for alleged offences including murder (Section 302) and dowry-related cruelty (Section 498A). The court found the Magistrate's warrant order lawful, as the petitioners stood accused of serious non-bailable offences and were evading arrest despite eight police raids on their residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

an-application-u-s-528-of-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-2023 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case