BIJAY PANDEY ALIAS BIJAY KUMAR PANDEY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — Cr.M.P./700/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 498A,302,323,504,506,IPC,3/4,DP,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010057312026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./3821/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./700/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )
Sub-Category
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIJAY PANDEY ALIAS BIJAY KUMAR PANDEY
Adv. PEEYUSH KRISHNA CHOUDHARY,AMRIT ANUNAY,AMRIT ANUNAY, ,BHANU KUMAR No.1,AMRIT ANUNAY
-
2.MEENA DEVI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition by Bijay Pandey and Meena Devi challenging a non-bailable arrest warrant issued against them for alleged offences including murder (Section 302) and dowry-related cruelty (Section 498A). The court found the Magistrate's warrant order lawful, as the petitioners stood accused of serious non-bailable offences and were evading arrest despite eight police raids on their residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./700/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition by Bijay Pandey and Meena Devi challenging a non-bailable arrest warrant issued against them for alleged offences including murder (Section 302) and dowry-related cruelty (Section 498A). The court found the Magistrate's warrant order lawful, as the petitioners stood accused of serious non-bailable offences and were evading arrest despite eight police raids on their residence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts