CHANDA PAHARIYA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA — B.A./2909/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010057152026

Filing Number

B.A./3810/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

B.A./2909/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDA PAHARIYA

    Adv. PUJA AGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail petition of Chanda Pahariya, who is accused of killing his wife with a lathi under Section 103(1) BNS 2023. The court found the allegations serious and the recovery of the weapon from the petitioner's house sufficient to deny bail, despite the petitioner's contention of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./2909/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail petition of Chanda Pahariya, who is accused of killing his wife with a lathi under Section 103(1) BNS 2023. The court found the allegations serious and the recovery of the weapon from the petitioner's house sufficient to deny bail, despite the petitioner's contention of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case