RAGHUNATH MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — JHHC10056852026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010056852026

Filing Number

WPC/1892/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAGHUNATH MAHTO

    Adv. AJAY KR SINGH,PUNAM SHRIVASTAVA,PUNAM SHRIVASTAVA, ,AMRENDRA DATRI,SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH,S G RAMAN,PUNAM SHRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.GYANI MAHTO

  3. 3.BINOD KUMAR MAHTO

  4. 4.SANTOSH MAHTO

  5. 5.MANOJ MAHTO

  6. 6.CHANDRESH MAHTO

  7. 7.JWALA MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PALAMU

  4. 4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, PANDWA ANCHAL

  5. 5.UDAY MAHTO

  6. 6.ANIL MAHTO

  7. 7.SATYANAND MAHTO

  8. 8.NIRANJAN MAHTO

  9. 9.MANOJ MAHTO

  10. 10.SHASHIKANT MAHTO

  11. 11.RAJNIKANT MAHTO

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court found the writ petition defective and not yet registered. The court granted three weeks to the petitioners to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being treated as never filed and rejected without further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court found the writ petition defective and not yet registered. The court granted three weeks to the petitioners to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being treated as never filed and rejected without further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case