RAGHUNATH MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — JHHC10056852026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010056852026
Filing Number
WPC/1892/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAGHUNATH MAHTO
Adv. AJAY KR SINGH,PUNAM SHRIVASTAVA,PUNAM SHRIVASTAVA, ,AMRENDRA DATRI,SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH,S G RAMAN,PUNAM SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.GYANI MAHTO
-
3.BINOD KUMAR MAHTO
-
4.SANTOSH MAHTO
-
5.MANOJ MAHTO
-
6.CHANDRESH MAHTO
-
7.JWALA MAHTO
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR
-
2.THE PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PALAMU
-
4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, PANDWA ANCHAL
-
5.UDAY MAHTO
-
6.ANIL MAHTO
-
7.SATYANAND MAHTO
-
8.NIRANJAN MAHTO
-
9.MANOJ MAHTO
-
10.SHASHIKANT MAHTO
-
11.RAJNIKANT MAHTO
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court found the writ petition defective and not yet registered. The court granted three weeks to the petitioners to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being treated as never filed and rejected without further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court found the writ petition defective and not yet registered. The court granted three weeks to the petitioners to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being treated as never filed and rejected without further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts