BABLU DAS @ BABLU KUMAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SARDHU MAHTO — B.A./3807/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 365,302,201,120B,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010056102026
Filing Number
B.A./3757/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
B.A./3807/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BABLU DAS @ BABLU KUMAR
Adv. PRATIUSH LALA,DEEPAK SAHU,DEEPAK SAHU, ,DEEPAK SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SARDHU MAHTO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Bablu Das in a murder and abduction case, finding that he was implicated solely on the basis of a co-accused's confessional statement with no corroborating evidence, coupled with his clean criminal record and prolonged custody since September 2025. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, maintain contact availability, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3807/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Bablu Das in a murder and abduction case, finding that he was implicated solely on the basis of a co-accused's confessional statement with no corroborating evidence, coupled with his clean criminal record and prolonged custody since September 2025. The court released him on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, maintain contact availability, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts