HULASH SAO ALIAS VIKASH KUMAR @ HULASH NAYAK vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND, ,YOGESH MODI — Cr.A(SJ)/245/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 324,329,352,351,34,IPC,3(I)(x),SC/ST,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010055002025

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/3668/2025

Filing Date

15-Feb-2025

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/245/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )

Sub-Category

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 324,329,352,351,34,IPC,3(I)(x),SC/ST,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HULASH SAO ALIAS VIKASH KUMAR @ HULASH NAYAK

    Adv. VIRENDRA KUMAR, ,PRAKASH CHANDRA

  2. 2.SANTOSH SAW ALIAS SANTOSH NAYAK

  3. 3.VIKASH KUMAR

  4. 4.BIKARAM SAO ALIAS BIKRAM NAYAK

  5. 5.MUNUYA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND, ,YOGESH MODI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ)/245/2025 The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appeal of five appellants charged under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC sections stemming from a boundary wall dispute with their neighbor. Finding that the core dispute was civil/land-related rather than one establishing a prima facie case under the SC/ST Act, the court granted them bail on surrender, requiring Rs. 10,000 bond each with two sureties and submission of Aadhaar/mobile details for case monitoring. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  8. 22-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  10. 19-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  12. 05-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  13. 03-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  14. 03-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  15. 13-Oct-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  16. 06-Oct-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  17. 18-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  18. 18-Aug-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  19. 16-Jul-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  20. 09-Jul-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  21. 02-Jul-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  22. 30-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  23. 10-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 15-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/245/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ)/245/2025 The Jharkhand High Court allowed the appeal of five appellants charged under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and IPC sections stemming from a boundary wall dispute with their neighbor. Finding that the core dispute was civil/land-related rather than one establishing a prima facie case under the SC/ST Act, the court granted them bail on surrender, requiring Rs. 10,000 bond each with two sureties and submission of Aadhaar/mobile details for case monitoring. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case