UPENDRA RAVIDAS ALIAS UPENDRA KUMAR DAS vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY, ,ANUP KUMAR YADAV,SANJAY KUMAR,PRANAV PRAKASH MISHRA — Cr.M.P./773/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 341.323,324,307,379,504,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010053292026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./3561/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./773/2026
Registration Date
23-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UPENDRA RAVIDAS ALIAS UPENDRA KUMAR DAS
Adv. PRATIUSH LALA,SANDEEP VERMA,SANDEEP VERMA, ,SANDEEP VERMA
-
2.LAXMI KANT RAVIDAS ALIAS LAKXHMIKANT RAVIDAS
-
3.MANTU RAVIDAS
-
4.PINTU RAVIDAS ALIAS DEVENDRA RAVIDAS
-
5.RAJU RAVIDAS
-
6.BHAGAT RAVIDAS ALIAS BHAGWAT RAVIDAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY, ,ANUP KUMAR YADAV,SANJAY KUMAR,PRANAV PRAKASH MISHRA
-
2.ASHOK YADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 773/2026 Court Decision: The Jharkhand High Court allowed the petition and quashed the entire criminal proceedings (Gomia P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023) against the six petitioners. Key Reasoning: The court found that the case involved a private dispute arising from a communal procession clash with no heinous crime elements, and the parties had reached complete settlement. Since no chargesheet had been filed against the petitioners and conviction prospects were remote, continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of process. The court applied Supreme Court principles from *Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab*, permitting quashing of even non-compoundable offences when settlement occurs during investigation and no serious public policy concerns exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./773/2026
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 773/2026 Court Decision: The Jharkhand High Court allowed the petition and quashed the entire criminal proceedings (Gomia P.S. Case No. 09 of 2023) against the six petitioners. Key Reasoning: The court found that the case involved a private dispute arising from a communal procession clash with no heinous crime elements, and the parties had reached complete settlement. Since no chargesheet had been filed against the petitioners and conviction prospects were remote, continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of process. The court applied Supreme Court principles from *Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab*, permitting quashing of even non-compoundable offences when settlement occurs during investigation and no serious public policy concerns exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts