VIMLA DEVI vs KISHORE KUMAR — C.M.P./398/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010053002025

Filing Number

C.M.P./1745/2025

Filing Date

14-Feb-2025

Registration No

C.M.P./398/2026

Registration Date

23-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 45 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIMLA DEVI

    Adv. RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE

  2. 2.PRADIP RAVIDAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KISHORE KUMAR

    Adv. ,SANTOSH KUMAR,ALOK LAL 1123

  2. 2.THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: In CMP 398/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary issued notice to the opposite parties regarding a limitation issue. The petitioners (Vimla Devi and Pradip Ravidas) were directed to file notice requisites through both speed post and court process within one week, with the petition facing automatic dismissal for non-compliance. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of service confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 27-Feb-2025

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 14-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.M.P./398/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In CMP 398/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary issued notice to the opposite parties regarding a limitation issue. The petitioners (Vimla Devi and Pradip Ravidas) were directed to file notice requisites through both speed post and court process within one week, with the petition facing automatic dismissal for non-compliance. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of service confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case