M/S SUNDARAM ENTERPRISES, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, KRISHAN NANDAN KUMAR ALIAS KRISHNA NANDA KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHYUT KESHAV — WPC/1854/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010052822026
Filing Number
WPC/1753/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPC/1854/2026
Registration Date
19-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Tender Matter ( 204 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S SUNDARAM ENTERPRISES, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR, KRISHAN NANDAN KUMAR ALIAS KRISHNA NANDA KUMAR
Adv. PANKAJ SRIVASTAVA,VINOD KUMAR,VINOD KUMAR, ,ASHISH GAUTAM,VINOD KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHYUT KESHAV
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHAIRMAN,
-
3.EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NAGAR PANCHAYAT, BARHARWA,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat, Barharwa to decide the petitioner's representation dated 19.05.2025 within eight weeks, after affording a hearing and passing a reasoned order. The court accepted the respondent's undertaking and left all contentions open for consideration on their merits, disposing the petition without any cost order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1854/2026
The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Executive Officer of Nagar Panchayat, Barharwa to decide the petitioner's representation dated 19.05.2025 within eight weeks, after affording a hearing and passing a reasoned order. The court accepted the respondent's undertaking and left all contentions open for consideration on their merits, disposing the petition without any cost order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts