AVINASH JEE ALIAS DASRATH GANJHU ALIAS DASRATH SINGH BHOKTA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANUP PAWAN TOPNO — Cr.A(DB)/510/2026

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010052112026

Filing Number

Cr.A(DB)/3487/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

Cr.A(DB)/510/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

National Investigation Agency Act ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AVINASH JEE ALIAS DASRATH GANJHU ALIAS DASRATH SINGH BHOKTA

    Adv. KUMAR HARSH, ,HARSH VARDHAN,TEJASWA MOHANTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANUP PAWAN TOPNO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court allowed Avinash Jee's appeal against the Sessions Judge's bail rejection order dated 21.01.2026. The court found that the appellant was not named in the FIR and was implicated solely on a co-accused's confessional statement, which warranted bail consideration despite his criminal antecedents. The court granted bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

  4. 19-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  5. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(DB)/510/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court allowed Avinash Jee's appeal against the Sessions Judge's bail rejection order dated 21.01.2026. The court found that the appellant was not named in the FIR and was implicated solely on a co-accused's confessional statement, which warranted bail consideration despite his criminal antecedents. The court granted bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case