KRISHNA PASWAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND — WPC/2955/2026

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010052022026

Filing Number

WPC/1724/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPC/2955/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )

Sub-Category

Encroachment Matter ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHNA PASWAN

    Adv. HARSH TIWARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND

  2. 2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PALAMAU

  3. 3.LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, PALAMAU

  4. 4.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, HUSSAINABAD

  5. 5.CIRCLE OFFICER, HUSSAINABAD

  6. 6.BHULAN PASWAN

  7. 7.GOPAL PASWAN

  8. 8.GULAB PASWAN

  9. 9.PHULWA DEVI

  10. 10.KAMLA DEVI

  11. 11.TETRI DEVI

  12. 12.AJAY PASWAN

  13. 13.ASHRESH PASWAN

  14. 14.BIRENDRA PASWAN

  15. 15.KANTI DEVI

  16. 16.SALITA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Krishna Paswan's writ petition challenging illegal occupation of his land by private parties (respondents 6-16). The court held that disputes over land possession between private individuals fall outside Article 226 jurisdiction and must be resolved in civil courts of competent jurisdiction rather than through constitutional writs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2955/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Krishna Paswan's writ petition challenging illegal occupation of his land by private parties (respondents 6-16). The court held that disputes over land possession between private individuals fall outside Article 226 jurisdiction and must be resolved in civil courts of competent jurisdiction rather than through constitutional writs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case