RABIUL ISLAM ALIAS MOTA ALIAS RAVIUL ISLAM vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR — B.A./1425/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),61(2),3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 15th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010051512026
Filing Number
B.A./3448/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
B.A./1425/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RABIUL ISLAM ALIAS MOTA ALIAS RAVIUL ISLAM
Adv. ABHIJEET KUMAR SINGH,SHAILESH KR SINGH,SHAILESH KR SINGH, ,PRAKHAR KUMAR VISHAIN,SHAILESH KR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rabiul Islam, accused of murder under BNS sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5), and the Arms Act. The court found that the petitioner was implicated based solely on a co-accused's confessional statement despite not being named in the FIR, and that a similarly-situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and comply with conditions including cooperation with trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./1425/2026
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rabiul Islam, accused of murder under BNS sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5), and the Arms Act. The court found that the petitioner was implicated based solely on a co-accused's confessional statement despite not being named in the FIR, and that a similarly-situated co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and comply with conditions including cooperation with trial and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts