ABDUL SATTAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND — JHHC10049042026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010049042026

Filing Number

WPC/1604/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL SATTAR

    Adv. AJAY KR SINGH,SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH,SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH, ,SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH

  2. 2.ABDUL GAFFAR

  3. 3.ABDUL WAHAB

  4. 4.ABDUL SHAHAB

  5. 5.JANBAZ ALAM

  6. 6.SHAHBAZ ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS, JHARKHAND

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RANCHI

  4. 4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, NAGARI ANCHAL

  5. 5.SAKHAWAT HUSSAIN

  6. 6.SADAKAT ANSARI

  7. 7.ZULFA KHATOON

  8. 8.SHAHNAZ KHATOON

  9. 9.AKHTAR HUSSAIN

  10. 10.SAFDAR ANSARI

  11. 11.SK. ASIRUDDIN ANSARI

  12. 12.MUHAMD ALAM

  13. 13.JAIRUN NISHA

  14. 14.SAMIDA KHATOON

  15. 15.ANIS ANSARI

  16. 16.HABIB ANSARI

  17. 17.KAOSHAR JAHAN

  18. 18.MD. OBAIS AZAD

  19. 19.MD. ANSAR DANISH

  20. 20.NIDHI SINGH

  21. 21.ZAKIRULLAH ALAM

  22. 22.SUNIL KUMAR

  23. 23.RISHABH TIWARY

  24. 24.SUJEET KUMAR

  25. 25.SHAWATI AWASTHI

  26. 26.AMAR KUMAR SAH

  27. 27.MADAN KUMAR SAH

  28. 28.KUSHAL SAGAR PRAKASH

  29. 29.RAJESH KUMAR

  30. 30.SANJEEV RANJAN

  31. 31.SANJAY KUMAR

  32. 32.SUDAMA CHANDEL BHARTI

  33. 33.KUNAL ANAND

  34. 34.TWINKAL KUMARI

  35. 35.DEEPAK KUMAR

  36. 36.JYOTI KUMAR

  37. 37.KAUSHAL KISHORE

  38. 38.USHA DEVI

  39. 39.RATAN MALA DEVI

  40. 40.SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH

  41. 41.VARUN KUMAR TIWARI

  42. 42.JYOTI KUMARI

  43. 43.NEERJA SHUKLA

  44. 44.PRIYANKA THAKUR

  45. 45.CHINMAY TIWARY

  46. 46.MRS. SUSHMA KUMARI

  47. 47.UMESH MANI PATHAK

  48. 48.CHAMCHAM DEVI

  49. 49.MANISH KUMAR

  50. 50.LALITA DEVI

  51. 51.AASTHA KUMARI

  52. 52.RUPINDER SINGH HORA

  53. 53.PRAMOD KUMAR

  54. 54.MEENA DEVI

  55. 55.NEETU DEVI

  56. 56.ARCHANA MISHRA

  57. 57.NITU SINGH

  58. 58.BAIBHAW GAHLAUT

  59. 59.ANUPRIYA

  60. 60.PARAMJIT SINGH

  61. 61.RANJIT KAUR

  62. 62.TEJWANT SINGH

  63. 63.ARCHANA SHAHI

  64. 64.ARCHANA SINGH

  65. 65.RANJANA SINGH

  66. 66.ANJALI KUMARI

  67. 67.VINDHYAVASINI

  68. 68.SARITA DEVI

  69. 69.ANITA DEVI

  70. 70.SALONI KUMARI

  71. 71.SHALINI KUMARI

  72. 72.RAJPATI DEVI

  73. 73.GAURI SHANKAR PRASAD

  74. 74.YASHODHARA

  75. 75.PUSHPA DIWAKAR

  76. 76.AANYA

  77. 77.BANDANA DEVI

  78. 78.KAMLAWATI DEVI

  79. 79.SIDDHARTH

  80. 80.BIJAY LAXMI CHOUDHARY

  81. 81.AZAD ANSARI

  82. 82.MANISH KUMAR

  83. 83.GOKUL CHANDRA MITRA

  84. 84.RENU KUMARI

  85. 85.PUSHPA KUMARI

  86. 86.GAYATRI DEVI

  87. 87.TARA AGRAWAL

  88. 88.MUKESH KUMAR

  89. 89.ROSHAN KUMAR

  90. 90.AJAY KUMAR BOSE

  91. 91.RAJESH KUMAR BAJPAI

  92. 92.MANPRIT KAUR

  93. 93.SOUMIK MITRA

  94. 94.NEETA GOYAL

  95. 95.SUMITRA KUMARI

  96. 96.RAHUL PARASHAR

  97. 97.SWETA SINGH

  98. 98.TABASSUM AARAA

  99. 99.KAMLAWATI DEVI

  100. 100.PRAMOD KUMAR DUBEY

  101. 101.VANDANA

  102. 102.AJAY KUMAR SINGH

  103. 103.BHARTI DEVI

  104. 104.KAMLA SINGH

  105. 105.PUJA DUBEY

  106. 106.RANJANA AGRAWAL

  107. 107.NARENDRA KUMAR SINGH

  108. 108.NAVNIT PRAKASH

  109. 109.RASHMI PATHAK

  110. 110.RAJ KUMAR

  111. 111.BIMLESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Abdul Sattar and others was not registered due to defects in the application. The High Court of Jharkhand granted three weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being deemed not filed, with no further action taken. The petitioner failed to appear before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Abdul Sattar and others was not registered due to defects in the application. The High Court of Jharkhand granted three weeks to cure the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being deemed not filed, with no further action taken. The petitioner failed to appear before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case