MD. JAMALUDDIN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BISHAMBHAR SHASTRI, ,AKHTAR HUSSAIN,PARWEZ AHMAD KHAN — Cr.A(SJ)/270/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 190,191,115,352,351/3,BNS,3(I),(s),SC/ST,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010048922026

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/3289/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/270/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL RIGHTS ( 114 )

Sub-Category

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Preven.of Atrocities)Act,1989 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 190,191,115,352,351/3,BNS,3(I),(s),SC/ST,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. JAMALUDDIN

    Adv. SIDHANT SINHA

  2. 2.MD. JAMIL AHMAD ALIAS JHAKIL AHMAD

  3. 3.SHARIA BANO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BISHAMBHAR SHASTRI, ,AKHTAR HUSSAIN,PARWEZ AHMAD KHAN

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ) /270/2026 Outcome: The interlocutory application (I.A. No.5044 of 2026) to implead the informant as respondent No.2 was allowed and disposed of. The main criminal appeal was adjourned to the next week with counsel directed to correct the cause title. The informant's counsel confirmed vakalatnama filing, waiving notice requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/270/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.A(SJ) /270/2026 Outcome: The interlocutory application (I.A. No.5044 of 2026) to implead the informant as respondent No.2 was allowed and disposed of. The main criminal appeal was adjourned to the next week with counsel directed to correct the cause title. The informant's counsel confirmed vakalatnama filing, waiving notice requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case