PARSHURAM YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH COMMISSIONER, NORTH CHHOTANAGPUR DIVISION, HAZARIBAG Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/4131/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010048742026

Filing Number

WPC/1599/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

WPC/4131/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Jamabandi ( 229 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARSHURAM YADAV

    Adv. SUDHIR KUMAR SHARMA,RAM PRAKASH SINGH,RAM PRAKASH SINGH, ,SHASHI SHEKHAR DWIVEDI,RAM PRAKASH SINGH

  2. 2.MUNDRIKA YADAV

  3. 3.PRAYAG YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH COMMISSIONER, NORTH CHHOTANAGPUR DIVISION, HAZARIBAG Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER - CUM - DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, CHATRA

  3. 3.THE ADDL. COLLECTOR, CHATRA

  4. 4.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, CHATRA

  5. 5.THE LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CHATRA

  6. 6.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, HUNTERGANJ

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: In WPC 4131/2026, the Jharkhand High Court disposed of Interim Application No. 6494 of 2026. Justice Ananda Sen ignored the procedural defect (Defect No. 4(1)) pointed out by the office and directed the office to proceed with the case. The main petition remains pending for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    Orders(with defect)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/4131/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WPC 4131/2026, the Jharkhand High Court disposed of Interim Application No. 6494 of 2026. Justice Ananda Sen ignored the procedural defect (Defect No. 4(1)) pointed out by the office and directed the office to proceed with the case. The main petition remains pending for substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case