ASHOK KUMAR GORAI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR, ,ASHUTOSH ANAND — Cont.(Cvl)/296/2025

Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: JHHC010048612025

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/1584/2025

Filing Date

11-Feb-2025

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/296/2025

Registration Date

24-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK KUMAR GORAI

    Adv. SAURABH SHEKHAR,SHAIL LAKRA,SHAIL LAKRA, ,ANURAG KUMAR,AMAN DAYAL SINGH,SHAIL LAKRA

  2. 2.MANOJ KUMAR BANERJEE

  3. 3.JINIS BAITHA

  4. 4.TULSI SAHU

  5. 5.KIRTI BHUSHAN SINGH SARDAR

  6. 6.VAISAKHI SOREN

  7. 7.ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

  8. 8.GOPAL HERENZ

  9. 9.NIRMAL HORO

  10. 10.SHIVRAM ORAON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR, ,ASHUTOSH ANAND

  2. 2.MR. PRASHANT KUMAR, THE SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT

  3. 3.MR. ARUN KUMAR RAI, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT

  4. 4.MR. VIJAY PRAKASH, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, RANCHI

  5. 5.MR. ASHWINI KUMAR, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION SARAIKELA

  6. 6.MR. JAWAHAR RAM, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION HAZARIBAGH

  7. 7.MR. RAMESHWAR RAVI DAS, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, DEOGHAR

  8. 8.MR. FANI BHUSHAN, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, CHAIBASA

  9. 9.MR. FANI BHUSHAN, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, CHHAKRADHARPUR

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF

    Case Summary: Cont.(Cvl) 296/2025 The High Court of Jharkhand found the State of Jharkhand was partially complying with a prior order but incorrectly calculating post-retirement benefits from regularization date instead of initial appointment date. The court clarified that benefits must be calculated from the petitioners' original appointment date per Supreme Court precedent and adjourned the case to 12.06.2026 for compliance verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

  5. 01-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  9. 28-Feb-2025

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  10. 28-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 11-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/296/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cont.(Cvl) 296/2025 The High Court of Jharkhand found the State of Jharkhand was partially complying with a prior order but incorrectly calculating post-retirement benefits from regularization date instead of initial appointment date. The court clarified that benefits must be calculated from the petitioners' original appointment date per Supreme Court precedent and adjourned the case to 12.06.2026 for compliance verification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case