LONGO MUNDA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — B.A./1367/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(4),BNS,2023,310(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010047362026

Filing Number

B.A./3189/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

B.A./1367/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(4),BNS,2023,310(2),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LONGO MUNDA

    Adv. RITESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Longo Munda, accused of robbery under BNS Sections 309(4) and 310(2), noting he was not named in the FIR, failed identification in the TIP, and lacks corroborating evidence beyond a co-accused's confession. The court ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and conditions including cooperation with trial, non-harassment of witnesses, and provision of contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./1367/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Longo Munda, accused of robbery under BNS Sections 309(4) and 310(2), noting he was not named in the FIR, failed identification in the TIP, and lacks corroborating evidence beyond a co-accused's confession. The court ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties and conditions including cooperation with trial, non-harassment of witnesses, and provision of contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case