SMT MAMTA DEVI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — Cr.M.P./430/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 409/34,420/34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: JHHC010046572026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./3152/2026

Filing Date

06-02-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./430/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 409/34,420/34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

SMT MAMTA DEVI

Adv. ANURAG KASHYAP

Respondent(s)

STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

20-02-2026

Admission

08-05-2026

Admission

01-05-2026

Admission

24-04-2026

Admission

17-04-2026

Admission

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

The Jharkhand High Court granted Smt. Mamta Devi's petition to restore Criminal Revision Filing No.28458 of 2024 to its original file, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 17.01.2026. The petitioner's counsel argued that defects were inadvertently not removed within time and undertook to cure them upon restoration, to which the State raised no serious objection. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi allowed the restoration accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted Smt. Mamta Devi's petition to restore Criminal Revision Filing No.28458 of 2024 to its original file, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 17.01.2026. The petitioner's counsel argued that defects were inadvertently not removed within time and undertook to cure them upon restoration, to which the State raised no serious objection. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi allowed the restoration accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case