PRINCE KUMAR PANDEY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA — Cr.M.P./602/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010044622026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./3053/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./602/2026
Registration Date
28-02-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Restoration ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRINCE KUMAR PANDEY
Adv. SHEO KUMAR SINGH,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE, ,JUHI KUMARI,ARYAN,PRIYA SAW,DIKSHA RANI,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
LAWAZIMA
Admission
Admission
Admission
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-02-2026 | LAWAZIMA |
| 13-03-2026 | Admission |
| 08-05-2026 | Admission |
| 01-05-2026 | Admission |
| 24-04-2026 | Admission |
Orders
The Jharkhand High Court granted Prince Kumar Pandey's petition to restore Criminal Revision Filing No.11017 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 18.12.2025. The Court found sufficient cause for restoration after the petitioner surrendered before the Court, thereby curing the only defect that led to the original dismissal. The State raised no objection to the restoration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Jharkhand High Court granted Prince Kumar Pandey's petition to restore Criminal Revision Filing No.11017 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 18.12.2025. The Court found sufficient cause for restoration after the petitioner surrendered before the Court, thereby curing the only defect that led to the original dismissal. The State raised no objection to the restoration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts