PRINCE KUMAR PANDEY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA — Cr.M.P./602/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: JHHC010044622026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./3053/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./602/2026

Registration Date

28-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

PRINCE KUMAR PANDEY

Adv. SHEO KUMAR SINGH,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE, ,JUHI KUMARI,ARYAN,PRIYA SAW,DIKSHA RANI,RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

24-02-2026

LAWAZIMA

13-03-2026

Admission

08-05-2026

Admission

01-05-2026

Admission

24-04-2026

Admission

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

The Jharkhand High Court granted Prince Kumar Pandey's petition to restore Criminal Revision Filing No.11017 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 18.12.2025. The Court found sufficient cause for restoration after the petitioner surrendered before the Court, thereby curing the only defect that led to the original dismissal. The State raised no objection to the restoration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court granted Prince Kumar Pandey's petition to restore Criminal Revision Filing No.11017 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 18.12.2025. The Court found sufficient cause for restoration after the petitioner surrendered before the Court, thereby curing the only defect that led to the original dismissal. The State raised no objection to the restoration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case