VINOD KUMAR SINHA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI — WPC/1274/2026
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 10th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010043112026
Filing Number
WPC/1382/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPC/1274/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )
Sub-Category
Encroachment Matter ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 15-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINOD KUMAR SINHA
Adv. SMITA SINHA,BAJRANG KUMAR,BAJRANG KUMAR, ,SHIVANI JALUKA,BAJRANG KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION, REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI
-
2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAZARIBAGH
-
3.DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, HAZARIBAGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an encroachment removal order, holding that a statutory appellate remedy exists under Section 11 of the Jharkhand Public Land Encroachment Act. The court declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, directing the petitioner to pursue the available statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
25-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1274/2026
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an encroachment removal order, holding that a statutory appellate remedy exists under Section 11 of the Jharkhand Public Land Encroachment Act. The court declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, directing the petitioner to pursue the available statutory appeal before the Appellate Authority instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts