SANTOSH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — JHHC10041982025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010041982025
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./2831/2025
Filing Date
05-Feb-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSH KUMAR
Adv. BINOD SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE
-
2.SONI DEVI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case Summary Santosh Kumar v. State of Jharkhand & Soni Devi (Cr. Revision Filing No. 2831 of 2025) The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioner Santosh Kumar, who had been in custody since 27.02.2026 serving a one-year simple imprisonment sentence for Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act offense. He was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The main petition was admitted for hearing with notice issued to opposite party No. 2 (Soni Devi) by 11th June 2026, and the trial court record was called for. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
-
06-Mar-2025
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
05-Feb-2025
Case filed
Case Summary Santosh Kumar v. State of Jharkhand & Soni Devi (Cr. Revision Filing No. 2831 of 2025) The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioner Santosh Kumar, who had been in custody since 27.02.2026 serving a one-year simple imprisonment sentence for Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act offense. He was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. The main petition was admitted for hearing with notice issued to opposite party No. 2 (Soni Devi) by 11th June 2026, and the trial court record was called for. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts