ROHIT KUMAR ALIAS ROHIT MAHTHA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SARDHU MAHTO — Cr.Rev./292/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),238(a),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010039592026
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./2695/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
Cr.Rev./292/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROHIT KUMAR ALIAS ROHIT MAHTHA
Adv. LAKHAN CHANDRA ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SARDHU MAHTO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the bail revision petition of juvenile Rohit Kumar, who had been in custody since July 2025 in connection with a death case. The court found strong circumstantial evidence against him, including CCTV footage showing the deceased was last seen with the petitioner on the same motorcycle and the deceased's body recovered in close proximity to where he was last seen with the petitioner, justifying the lower courts' bail rejection orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.Rev./292/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the bail revision petition of juvenile Rohit Kumar, who had been in custody since July 2025 in connection with a death case. The court found strong circumstantial evidence against him, including CCTV footage showing the deceased was last seen with the petitioner on the same motorcycle and the deceased's body recovered in close proximity to where he was last seen with the petitioner, justifying the lower courts' bail rejection orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts