PARAS KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ASHOK KUMAR, ,RUPESH SINGH,SUDARSHAN SHRIVASTAVA — WPC/551/2022
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010038782022
Filing Number
WPC/740/2022
Filing Date
07-Feb-2022
Registration No
WPC/551/2022
Registration Date
09-Feb-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE RELATING TO STATE GOVT. ( 171 )
Sub-Category
Punishment ( 33 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARAS KUMAR
Adv. KRISHNA MURARI,SUNIL SINGH,SUNIL SINGH, ,RAJ VARDHAN,SUNIL SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ASHOK KUMAR, ,RUPESH SINGH,SUDARSHAN SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.THE SECRETARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT GOVT OF JHARKHAND
-
3.THE JOINT SECRETARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT GOVT OF JHARKHAND
-
4.THE UNDER SECRETARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT GOVT OF JHARKHAND
-
5.THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL JHARKHAND
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
Case Summary: Paras Kumar v. State of Jharkhand (WPC/551/2022) The High Court of Jharkhand quashed a penalty order permanently withholding 20% of a retired engineer's pension, finding the disciplinary proceedings fatally defective. The court held that oral evidence was necessary to prove charges of delayed property return filing, and critically, there was no judicial finding quantifying why 20% deduction for lifetime was imposed, making the punishment arbitrary and unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Feb-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
25-Aug-2022
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
25-Jul-2022
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. Pathak
-
07-Feb-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/551/2022
Case Summary: Paras Kumar v. State of Jharkhand (WPC/551/2022) The High Court of Jharkhand quashed a penalty order permanently withholding 20% of a retired engineer's pension, finding the disciplinary proceedings fatally defective. The court held that oral evidence was necessary to prove charges of delayed property return filing, and critically, there was no judicial finding quantifying why 20% deduction for lifetime was imposed, making the punishment arbitrary and unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts