RAJDEV PANDEY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR — WPC/3229/2026
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010036912026
Filing Number
WPC/1191/2026
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
WPC/3229/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJDEV PANDEY
Adv. VANI KUMARI,ANIKET RANJAN,ANIKET RANJAN, ,MANISHA SHAILY NAG,RENUKA TRIVEDY,ANIKET RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE AND LAND REFORMS DEPARTMENT, JHARKHAND, RANCHI
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LATEHAR, JHARKHAND
-
4.THE CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, CENTRAL COAL FIELDS LIMITED
-
5.THE H.O.D., (LAND AND REVENUE), CENTRAL COAL FIELDS LIMITED
-
6.THE ANCHAL ADHIKARI, BARIATU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
In WPC 3229/2026, petitioner Rajdev Pandey filed a writ petition against the State of Jharkhand and related authorities concerning land and revenue matters involving Central Coal Fields Limited. The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition on 4 May 2026 after the petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Orders (Withdrawal of Cases)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
17-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3229/2026
In WPC 3229/2026, petitioner Rajdev Pandey filed a writ petition against the State of Jharkhand and related authorities concerning land and revenue matters involving Central Coal Fields Limited. The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition on 4 May 2026 after the petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts