SUNIL KUMAR SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA — Cr.M.P./1182/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: JHHC010036802026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./2493/2026

Filing Date

31-01-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1182/2026

Registration Date

22-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Coram

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

SUNIL KUMAR SINGH

Adv. RAKESH KUMAR

CHANDAN SINGH

RAKESH SINGH

RINKU SINGH

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

24-02-2026

LAWAZIMA

08-05-2026

Admission

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

The High Court of Jharkhand granted the petition filed by four minor petitioners seeking restoration of Criminal Revision No. 3007 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a court order dated 18.12.2025. The court accepted the petitioners' explanation that clerical mistakes caused the delay in removing defects within the stipulated time, and with the State having no serious objection, restored the revision petition to its original file for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted the petition filed by four minor petitioners seeking restoration of Criminal Revision No. 3007 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-compliance with a court order dated 18.12.2025. The court accepted the petitioners' explanation that clerical mistakes caused the delay in removing defects within the stipulated time, and with the State having no serious objection, restored the revision petition to its original file for consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case