KHURSHID ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MOHUA PALIT — Cr.Rev./347/2026
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010036622026
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./2481/2026
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
Cr.Rev./347/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KHURSHID ANSARI
Adv. PRATHIK,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY, ,PRATIK SINGH,RITU RAJ,SHAMBHU NATH TIWARI,ABHISHEK KUMAR MISHRA,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MOHUA PALIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Summary of Cr.Rev. 347/2026 - Khurshid Ansari v. State of Jharkhand The Jharkhand High Court set aside bail rejection orders and granted bail to juvenile petitioner Khurshid Ansari. The court found merit in arguments that the relationship was consensual between petitioner and a 19-year-old major, and notably relied on the inordinate 2.5-month delay in filing the FIR as indicative of the complaint's credibility issues. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, with conditions requiring paternal supervision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
05-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.Rev./347/2026
Summary of Cr.Rev. 347/2026 - Khurshid Ansari v. State of Jharkhand The Jharkhand High Court set aside bail rejection orders and granted bail to juvenile petitioner Khurshid Ansari. The court found merit in arguments that the relationship was consensual between petitioner and a 19-year-old major, and notably relied on the inordinate 2.5-month delay in filing the FIR as indicative of the complaint's credibility issues. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, with conditions requiring paternal supervision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts