THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. REPRESENTED THRO ITS ASST. MANAGER T.P. HUB vs CHAMPA SARDAR Advocate - ARVIND KR LALL — MA/105/2026

Case under An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

CNR: JHHC010035992026

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

MA/1165/2026

Filing Date

30-01-2026

Registration No

MA/105/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Coram

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MOTOR VEHICLE ( 152 )

Sub-Category

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. REPRESENTED THRO ITS ASST. MANAGER T.P. HUB

Adv. GANESH C. JHA

Respondent(s)

CHAMPA SARDAR Advocate - ARVIND KR LALL

JITEN SARDAR

HIRAMANI SARDAR

SAGEN SARDAR

SUJIT NARAYAN SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

08-05-2026

Orders

19-06-2026

Orders

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Case Summary: MA/105/2026 In this Miscellaneous Appeal before the Jharkhand High Court, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. challenged an award. The Court issued notice to respondents (the Sardar family and Sujit Kumar Singh) returnable on June 19, 2026, and stayed execution of the impugned award after the appellant deposited the entire awarded amount in court. The stay application (I.A. No. 6519/2026) was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MA/105/2026 In this Miscellaneous Appeal before the Jharkhand High Court, The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. challenged an award. The Court issued notice to respondents (the Sardar family and Sujit Kumar Singh) returnable on June 19, 2026, and stayed execution of the impugned award after the appellant deposited the entire awarded amount in court. The stay application (I.A. No. 6519/2026) was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case