JAGDISH NAGESIYA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BANDANA SINHA — B.A./1031/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 15th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010032582026
Filing Number
B.A./2206/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
B.A./1031/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGDISH NAGESIYA
Adv. NANDAN PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BANDANA SINHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary The Jharkhand High Court denied bail to Jagdish Nagesiya, who has been in custody since March 2025 for his wife's death under Section 103(1) BNS. The court found that the victim was discovered dead in her matrimonial home with multiple injuries including fractured ribs, and determined this fact was sufficient to reject the bail petition despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and lack of eyewitnesses. The court directed the State to expedite witness production for trial resumption on May 11, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./1031/2026
Case Summary The Jharkhand High Court denied bail to Jagdish Nagesiya, who has been in custody since March 2025 for his wife's death under Section 103(1) BNS. The court found that the victim was discovered dead in her matrimonial home with multiple injuries including fractured ribs, and determined this fact was sufficient to reject the bail petition despite the petitioner's claims of false implication and lack of eyewitnesses. The court directed the State to expedite witness production for trial resumption on May 11, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts