ARVIND KUMAR SINGH ALAIS ARVIND SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA — Cr.M.P./1379/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 74,76,115(2),127,303(2),BNS. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010028412026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./1928/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1379/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 74,76,115(2),127,303(2),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARVIND KUMAR SINGH ALAIS ARVIND SINGH

    Adv. RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE,JUHI KUMARI,JUHI KUMARI, ,PRIYA SAW,NISHAD KHAN,DIKSHA RANI,VISHWAJEET KUMAR TIWARI,JUHI KUMARI

  2. 2.SATYENDRA SINGH

  3. 3.DINESH GOPE

  4. 4.UMESH GOPE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRIYA SHRESTHA

  2. 2.XXX

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Outcome Summary: Notice was issued to Opposite Party No. 2. The court adjourned the case and directed the petitioner to file service requisites within two weeks via speed post and court process, with automatic dismissal if not complied. The rule was made returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1379/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Outcome Summary: Notice was issued to Opposite Party No. 2. The court adjourned the case and directed the petitioner to file service requisites within two weeks via speed post and court process, with automatic dismissal if not complied. The rule was made returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case