SINGH GENERAL WORKS HANDLING AND TRANSPORT CONTRACTOR THRO ITS PROPRIETOR MR. DEO CHANDRA CHOUDHARY vs M/S. ONEWAY PROJECTS SERVICES PVT. LTD. THRO ITS DIRECTOR — A.APPL/15/2026
Case under An Application U/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 Section 11(6),A&C,ACT,1996. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010028092026
Filing Number
A.APPL/898/2026
Filing Date
24-01-2026
Registration No
A.APPL/15/2026
Registration Date
17-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARBITRATION ( 103 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration & Concilation Ordinance, 1996 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SINGH GENERAL WORKS HANDLING AND TRANSPORT CONTRACTOR THRO ITS PROPRIETOR MR. DEO CHANDRA CHOUDHARY
Adv. RISHI RANJAN VATS,ABHINAY KUMAR,ABHINAY KUMAR, ,PARUL PARASAR,K HARI,ABHINAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
M/S. ONEWAY PROJECTS SERVICES PVT. LTD. THRO ITS DIRECTOR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
LAWAZIMA
Admission
Orders
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-02-2026 | LAWAZIMA |
| 20-03-2026 | Admission |
| 08-05-2026 | Orders |
| 10-04-2026 | Admission |
Orders
Case Summary: A.APPL/15/2026 The Jharkhand High Court allowed Singh General Works' arbitration application and appointed Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes with Oneway Projects Services Pvt. Ltd. The court held that all objections, including respondent's challenge to the arbitral clause's existence, are reserved for the arbitral tribunal's decision. The parties must equally bear arbitration costs initially, subject to final cost allocation in the tribunal's award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: A.APPL/15/2026 The Jharkhand High Court allowed Singh General Works' arbitration application and appointed Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes with Oneway Projects Services Pvt. Ltd. The court held that all objections, including respondent's challenge to the arbitral clause's existence, are reserved for the arbitral tribunal's decision. The parties must equally bear arbitration costs initially, subject to final cost allocation in the tribunal's award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts