SINGH GENERAL WORKS HANDLING AND TRANSPORT CONTRACTOR THRO ITS PROPRIETOR MR. DEO CHANDRA CHOUDHARY vs M/S. ONEWAY PROJECTS SERVICES PVT. LTD. THRO ITS DIRECTOR — A.APPL/14/2026
Case under An Application U/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 Section 11(6),A,&C,ACT,1996. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010028082026
Filing Number
A.APPL/897/2026
Filing Date
24-01-2026
Registration No
A.APPL/14/2026
Registration Date
17-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARBITRATION ( 103 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration & Concilation Ordinance, 1996 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SINGH GENERAL WORKS HANDLING AND TRANSPORT CONTRACTOR THRO ITS PROPRIETOR MR. DEO CHANDRA CHOUDHARY
Adv. RISHI RANJAN VATS,ABHINAY KUMAR,ABHINAY KUMAR, ,PARUL PARASAR,K HARI,ABHINAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
M/S. ONEWAY PROJECTS SERVICES PVT. LTD. THRO ITS DIRECTOR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
LAWAZIMA
Admission
Orders
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-02-2026 | LAWAZIMA |
| 20-03-2026 | Admission |
| 08-05-2026 | Orders |
| 10-04-2026 | Admission |
Orders
Case Summary: A.APPL/14/2026 The Jharkhand High Court allowed Singh General Works' arbitration application and appointed Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a 2019 work agreement with Oneway Projects Services. The court held that email service was valid and proper, and affirmed that all of respondent's objections—including claims about the arbitration clause's non-existence—remain open for the arbitral tribunal's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: A.APPL/14/2026 The Jharkhand High Court allowed Singh General Works' arbitration application and appointed Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a 2019 work agreement with Oneway Projects Services. The court held that email service was valid and proper, and affirmed that all of respondent's objections—including claims about the arbitration clause's non-existence—remain open for the arbitral tribunal's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts