MANOJ MANDAL ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR MANDAL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI, ,GAUTAM KUMAR,ANIL KR SINGH,SANDDIP BARNWAL — Cr.M.P./268/2023
Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 420,323,341,504,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010026592023
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./1970/2023
Filing Date
27-01-2023
Registration No
Cr.M.P./268/2023
Registration Date
30-01-2023
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Order ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANOJ MANDAL ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR MANDAL
Adv. MUKESH BIHARI LAL,RAJIV KUMAR KARAN,RAJIV KUMAR KARAN, ,AVILASH KUMAR,RAJIV KUMAR KARAN
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI, ,GAUTAM KUMAR,ANIL KR SINGH,SANDDIP BARNWAL
RAM KUMAR SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Fresh Filing (Previous day)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-02-2023 | Fresh Filing (Previous day) |
Orders
The Jharkhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Manoj Mandal for cheating, criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and insult charges arising from a commercial dispute over unpaid brick supplies (₹30,34,326 outstanding). The court held that mere non-payment in a civil commercial transaction, without proof of initial deception, does not constitute cheating; similarly, unsubstantiated allegations of beating and abuse lack essential ingredients for assault and insult offenses, making continuation of proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Jharkhand High Court quashed criminal proceedings against Manoj Mandal for cheating, criminal intimidation, wrongful restraint, and insult charges arising from a commercial dispute over unpaid brick supplies (₹30,34,326 outstanding). The court held that mere non-payment in a civil commercial transaction, without proof of initial deception, does not constitute cheating; similarly, unsubstantiated allegations of beating and abuse lack essential ingredients for assault and insult offenses, making continuation of proceedings an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts