RAJESH ROUT ALLIAS RAJESH KUMAR ROUT vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANAT KUMAR JHA — B.A./3282/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,326(A),458,,IPC,12,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010025462026

Filing Number

B.A./1722/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

B.A./3282/2026

Registration Date

17-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 22-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,326(A),458,,IPC,12,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH ROUT ALLIAS RAJESH KUMAR ROUT

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR, ,INDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANAT KUMAR JHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Rajesh Rout, finding no grounds to enlarge him on bail given the serious allegations against him, the earlier rejection of his bail application on merits, and the trial's ongoing status. However, the court directed the State to ensure the remaining witnesses (out of 20 total) are promptly produced before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3282/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Rajesh Rout, finding no grounds to enlarge him on bail given the serious allegations against him, the earlier rejection of his bail application on merits, and the trial's ongoing status. However, the court directed the State to ensure the remaining witnesses (out of 20 total) are promptly produced before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case