KAJU PANDIT ALIAS RAJU PANDIT ALIAS KAJU KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN — B.A./3026/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 61(1),376,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010024792026
Filing Number
B.A./1670/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
B.A./3026/2026
Registration Date
09-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 22-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAJU PANDIT ALIAS RAJU PANDIT ALIAS KAJU KUMAR
Adv. FAIZ UR RAHMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Summary The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Kaju Pandit, who is accused of rape under Sections 64(1) and 376 of BNS involving a minor victim (16-17 years old). The court found direct allegations against the petitioner based on the victim's recorded statement under Section 183 BNSS and declined to enlarge him on bail, despite arguments of false implication and no criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
06-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3026/2026
Summary The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Kaju Pandit, who is accused of rape under Sections 64(1) and 376 of BNS involving a minor victim (16-17 years old). The court found direct allegations against the petitioner based on the victim's recorded statement under Section 183 BNSS and declined to enlarge him on bail, despite arguments of false implication and no criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts