ENAMUL ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — B.A./1000/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111(2b),111(3),111(4),319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2),BNS,2023,66(B),66(C),66(D),84(C),IT, ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010024512026
Filing Number
B.A./1642/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
B.A./1000/2026
Registration Date
04-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )
Sub-Category
Cyber Crime ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ENAMUL ANSARI
Adv. PRATHIK,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY, ,RITU RAJ,ABHISHEK KUMAR MISHRA,KUMARI SUPRIYA,PRATIK SINGH,ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. No. 1000/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Enamul Ansari, accused in a cybercrime case (Deoghar P.S. Case No. 160/2025), on the grounds that no victim had filed a complaint against him, he had no criminal history, and he had been in custody since December 1, 2025. The court directed his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
12-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./1000/2026
Case Summary: B.A. No. 1000/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Enamul Ansari, accused in a cybercrime case (Deoghar P.S. Case No. 160/2025), on the grounds that no victim had filed a complaint against him, he had no criminal history, and he had been in custody since December 1, 2025. The court directed his release on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts