AKSHAY TIWARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA, ,ANURAG KASHYAP,SUPRIYA DAYAL — Cr.M.P./207/2024
Case under An Application U/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 498A,379,IPC,3,4,DP,ACT. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010021492024
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./1558/2024
Filing Date
20-01-2024
Registration No
Cr.M.P./207/2024
Registration Date
27-01-2024
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
F.i.r ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AKSHAY TIWARI
Adv. AKASH DEEP,PRITI PRIYAMVADA,PRITI PRIYAMVADA, ,PRITI PRIYAMVADA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA, ,ANURAG KASHYAP,SUPRIYA DAYAL
RANJU KUMARI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
LAWAZIMA
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-02-2024 | LAWAZIMA |
| 16-12-2025 | Admission |
Orders
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 207/2024 The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Akshay Tiwari's interlocutory application to amend his Criminal Miscellaneous Petition to include a prayer for quashing the charge-framing order dated 18.10.2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau in connection with G.R. Case No. 1781 of 2023. The Court directed the petitioner to file a consolidated amended petition within four weeks, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. The case was adjourned pending filing of the consolidated petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 207/2024 The Jharkhand High Court allowed petitioner Akshay Tiwari's interlocutory application to amend his Criminal Miscellaneous Petition to include a prayer for quashing the charge-framing order dated 18.10.2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau in connection with G.R. Case No. 1781 of 2023. The Court directed the petitioner to file a consolidated amended petition within four weeks, failing which the petition would stand dismissed. The case was adjourned pending filing of the consolidated petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts