PRABHU MANJHI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - FAHAD ALLAM — B.A./659/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),BNS,2023. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010020912026

Filing Number

B.A./1413/2026

Filing Date

20-Jan-2026

Registration No

B.A./659/2026

Registration Date

24-Jan-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),BNS,2023

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRABHU MANJHI

    Adv. SAMAN AHMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - FAHAD ALLAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Prabhu Manjhi's bail application under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 in a murder case (Section 103(1) BNS). The court found direct allegations against the petitioner, who is accused of assaulting his brother-in-law with an iron sabal during a land dispute, causing fatal injuries. Considering the advanced trial stage (6 of 13 chargesheet witnesses examined) and the direct evidence against the accused, the court declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar Choudhary

  5. 20-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./659/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Prabhu Manjhi's bail application under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 in a murder case (Section 103(1) BNS). The court found direct allegations against the petitioner, who is accused of assaulting his brother-in-law with an iron sabal during a land dispute, causing fatal injuries. Considering the advanced trial stage (6 of 13 chargesheet witnesses examined) and the direct evidence against the accused, the court declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case