MITHU ALIAS SOHRAB QUARESHI ALIAS MITHU QUARESHI ALIAS SOHRAB, vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE — Cr.A(SJ)/67/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 143,188,269,290,109,IPC12(I)J,BAPS. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010020602026

Filing Number

Cr.A(SJ)/1392/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

Cr.A(SJ)/67/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Jharkhand Bovine Prohibition Of Slaughter Act, 2005 ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 143,188,269,290,109,IPC12(I)J,BAPS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITHU ALIAS SOHRAB QUARESHI ALIAS MITHU QUARESHI ALIAS SOHRAB,

    Adv. Advocate- ,SHAHID YUNUS,ANUJ KUMAR TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRABIR KUMAR CHATTERJEE alias PRABIR CHATTERJEE

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.67 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand involved appellant Mithu @ Sohrab Quareshi against The State of Jharkhand. On 03/07.05.2026, Justice Rajesh Kumar adjourned the case for one week as requested by the appellant's senior counsel, with no substantive order on merits passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.67 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand involved appellant Mithu @ Sohrab Quareshi against The State of Jharkhand. On 03/07.05.2026, Justice Rajesh Kumar adjourned the case for one week as requested by the appellant's senior counsel, with no substantive order on merits passed at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case