NAYEEM ANSARI ALIAS MD. NAYEEM ANSARI ALIAS SONU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR — B.A./923/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 64(2)(m),BNS,2023. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 25th March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010019812026
Filing Number
B.A./1338/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Registration No
B.A./923/2026
Registration Date
02-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAYEEM ANSARI ALIAS MD. NAYEEM ANSARI ALIAS SONU
Adv. PANDEY A. N. ROY,KAVITA KUMARI,KAVITA KUMARI, ,SAKSHI CHARU,KAVITA KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Nayeem Ansari in a rape case (BNS Section 64(2)(m)) after finding the victim appeared to be a consenting party who engaged in repeated physical relations under the pretext of marriage, rather than being forcibly subjected to it. The court noted the victim's failure to lodge an immediate complaint after the alleged first occurrence and that POCSO charges were dropped after the victim was confirmed to be over 18 years old, warranting the petitioner's release on Rs. 10,000 bail with conditions against intimidation or evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./923/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Nayeem Ansari in a rape case (BNS Section 64(2)(m)) after finding the victim appeared to be a consenting party who engaged in repeated physical relations under the pretext of marriage, rather than being forcibly subjected to it. The court noted the victim's failure to lodge an immediate complaint after the alleged first occurrence and that POCSO charges were dropped after the victim was confirmed to be over 18 years old, warranting the petitioner's release on Rs. 10,000 bail with conditions against intimidation or evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts