M/S. SATI AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD. THRO ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI ABHINEET RANJAN vs THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANCHI Advocate - AMIT KUMAR, ,ANURAG VIJAY,KUMAR VAIBHAV — JHHC10019552026
Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010019552026
Filing Number
WPC/640/2026
Filing Date
19-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. SATI AUTO COMPONENTS PVT. LTD. THRO ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, SRI ABHINEET RANJAN
Adv. NITIN KR PASARI,SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH,SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH, ,SAMIKSHA KUMARI,SHUBHAM CHOUDHARY,GAURAV KAUSHALESH,SUDHIR KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANCHI Advocate - AMIT KUMAR, ,ANURAG VIJAY,KUMAR VAIBHAV
-
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3 (
-
3., JAMSHEDPUR
Adv. KUMAR VAIBHAV ANURAG VIJAY
-
4.THE NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTER
Adv. KUMAR VAIBHAV ANURAG VIJAY
Case History
-
07-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
Case Summary: In W.P. (T) (Filing) No. 640 of 2026, Sati Auto Components Pvt. Ltd. sought to challenge an income tax order before the Jharkhand High Court. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, and the court granted leave to withdraw with liberty to file an appeal within four weeks. The petition was disposed of without any order for costs, with the direction that the Appellate Authority should decide the subsequent appeal on merits without considering limitation issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Feb-2026
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
19-Jan-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: In W.P. (T) (Filing) No. 640 of 2026, Sati Auto Components Pvt. Ltd. sought to challenge an income tax order before the Jharkhand High Court. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, and the court granted leave to withdraw with liberty to file an appeal within four weeks. The petition was disposed of without any order for costs, with the direction that the Appellate Authority should decide the subsequent appeal on merits without considering limitation issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts