BHUTAK RAVIDAS vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINES AND MINERALS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Advocate - PRASHANT PALLAV, ,PRATYUSH RAJ,KASHISH TIWARY,PRADYOT CHATTERJEE,ANKIT VISHAL,AJAY KUMAR SAH,INDRAJIT SINHA,AMIT KUMAR DAS,ASHOK KR YADAV — JHHC10018602026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010018602026

Filing Number

WPC/605/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUTAK RAVIDAS

    Adv. JITESH KUMAR

  2. 2.RAJENDRA RAM

  3. 3.ARUN RAM

  4. 4.BAIJNATH RAM

  5. 5.RUPLAL RAVIDAS

  6. 6.DINESH KUMAR DAS

  7. 7.CHAMARI SAW

  8. 8.SHANKAR BHUIYAN

  9. 9.KAULESHWARI DEVI

  10. 10.PANU BHUIYAN

  11. 11.ANANDI BHUIYAN

  12. 12.KAILASH BHUIYAN

  13. 13.BIFA BHUIYAN

  14. 14.BIGUL PRASAD

  15. 15.SONI DEVI

  16. 16.BASUDEV SAW

  17. 17.JHUNIYA DEVI

  18. 18.SURESH BHUIYAN

  19. 19.PRADIP BHUIYAN

  20. 20.MUKESH RAM

  21. 21.LALMAN BHUIYAN

  22. 22.VIKASH BHUIYAN

  23. 23.TIJAN BHUIYAN

  24. 24.JAGESHWAR SAW

  25. 25.DEVKI SAW

  26. 26.TAHAL SAH

  27. 27.CHHOTU KUMAR

  28. 28.FULCHAND RAM

  29. 29.RAMU KUMAR RAM

  30. 30.MASOMAT SOHARI

  31. 31.UGAN SAW

  32. 32.DEOKI RAJAK

  33. 33.RAJENDRA NAYAK

  34. 34.GANESH KUMAR GUPTA

  35. 35.KISHUN KUMAR DAS

  36. 36.ASHA DEVI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY, MINES AND MINERALS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Advocate - PRASHANT PALLAV, ,PRATYUSH RAJ,KASHISH TIWARY,PRADYOT CHATTERJEE,ANKIT VISHAL,AJAY KUMAR SAH,INDRAJIT SINHA,AMIT KUMAR DAS,ASHOK KR YADAV

  2. 2.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, MINES AND MINERALS, GOVT OF JHARKHAND

  3. 3.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAZARIBAGH

  4. 4.ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, HAZARIBAGH

  5. 5.DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HAZARIBAGH

  6. 6.CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR, CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED,

  7. 7.GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED

  8. 8.GENERAL MANAGER, AMRAPALI-CHANDRAGUPT AREA, TANDWA

  9. 9.PROJECT OFFICER, CHANDRAGUPT PROJECT, CCL, AMRAPALI-CHANDRAGUPT AREA, CCL, TANDWA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand found the petition defective and not yet registered. The Court granted three weeks to remove the defects in compliance with the High Court's Standard Operating Procedure. If defects are not cured within this period, the petition will be deemed not filed and no further action will be taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Feb-2026

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand found the petition defective and not yet registered. The Court granted three weeks to remove the defects in compliance with the High Court's Standard Operating Procedure. If defects are not cured within this period, the petition will be deemed not filed and no further action will be taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case