SHAHIL ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN — Cr.M.P./1163/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010018192026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./1221/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1163/2026
Registration Date
21-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Modification Matter ( 20 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAHIL ANSARI
Adv. PRAVEEN SHANKAR PRASAD,LUKESH KUMAR,LUKESH KUMAR, ,PRADEEP KUMAR,SIDHARTH SUDHANSHU,LUKESH KUMAR
MD, DEBBA ALIAS SAHEB RAJA ALIAS MD. DEBHA, ALIAS MD. DEHBA,
MOHARAM ALI ALIAS RAJA ALIAS MOHARAM ALI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
LAWAZIMA
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-02-2026 | LAWAZIMA |
| 08-05-2026 | Admission |
Orders
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1163/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition and directed petitioners Shahil Ansari and others to file a supplementary affidavit within four weeks proving deposit of Rs.5,000 each as cash security in connection with Jharia P.S. Case No.150 of 2021. The court warned that failure to file the affidavit within the stipulated period would result in automatic dismissal of the petition. The trial court was directed to accept the cash security if tendered by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.1163/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition and directed petitioners Shahil Ansari and others to file a supplementary affidavit within four weeks proving deposit of Rs.5,000 each as cash security in connection with Jharia P.S. Case No.150 of 2021. The court warned that failure to file the affidavit within the stipulated period would result in automatic dismissal of the petition. The trial court was directed to accept the cash security if tendered by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts