SANDEEP ORAON vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR — Cr.Rev./344/2026

Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010014002026

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./954/2026

Filing Date

14-Jan-2026

Registration No

Cr.Rev./344/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANDEEP ORAON

    Adv. ABHAY KR CHATURVEDY,HADISH ANSARI,HADISH ANSARI, ,HADISH ANSARI

  2. 2.RAJ KHERWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to two juvenile petitioners, Sandeep Oraon and Raj Kherwar, who were not originally named in the FIR but implicated based on a co-accused's disclosure statement. The court found the manner of implication insufficient and set aside the lower courts' bail rejection orders, directing their release on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, on condition that one surety be the petitioner's father responsible for ensuring the juvenile's safekeeping away from anti-social elements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  4. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  5. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 14-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.Rev./344/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to two juvenile petitioners, Sandeep Oraon and Raj Kherwar, who were not originally named in the FIR but implicated based on a co-accused's disclosure statement. The court found the manner of implication insufficient and set aside the lower courts' bail rejection orders, directing their release on Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties each, on condition that one surety be the petitioner's father responsible for ensuring the juvenile's safekeeping away from anti-social elements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case