M/S URMILA RCP PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR DEEPAK KUMAR BHARTHUAR vs THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE Advocate - AMIT KUMAR — WPC/1753/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed of as Withdrawn on 25th March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010010982026
Filing Number
WPC/360/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
WPC/1753/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
TAXATION ( 186 )
Sub-Category
Service Tax ( 38 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed of as Withdrawn
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S URMILA RCP PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR DEEPAK KUMAR BHARTHUAR
Adv. ANUPAM ANAND,PRANAV KUMAR,PRANAV KUMAR, ,PRANAV KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE Advocate - AMIT KUMAR
-
2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, RANCHI SOUTH DIVISION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court allowed Urmila RCP Projects Private Limited to withdraw its writ petition with liberty to appeal the impugned CGST order, granting eight weeks to file the appeal with pre-deposit. The court directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal on merits without considering limitation issues, recognizing that the original petition was filed within the prescribed limitation period and pursued in good faith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1753/2026
The Jharkhand High Court allowed Urmila RCP Projects Private Limited to withdraw its writ petition with liberty to appeal the impugned CGST order, granting eight weeks to file the appeal with pre-deposit. The court directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal on merits without considering limitation issues, recognizing that the original petition was filed within the prescribed limitation period and pursued in good faith. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts