ANUJ RAKESH KUJUR vs JAYA SUSHON HORO Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR, ,NAVEEN KUMAR JAISWAL — FA/72/2026

Case under An Appeal U/s 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19(1). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

CNR: JHHC010010802026

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

FA/353/2026

Filing Date

12-01-2026

Registration No

FA/72/2026

Registration Date

24-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD , HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

Coram

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD , HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )

Sub-Category

Family Courts Act, 1984 ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

An Appeal U/s 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19(1)

Petitioner(s)

ANUJ RAKESH KUJUR

Adv. SUMAN KUMAR GHOSH,ATANU BANERJEE,ATANU BANERJEE, ,ADITYA BANERJEE,ATANU BANERJEE

Respondent(s)

JAYA SUSHON HORO Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR, ,NAVEEN KUMAR JAISWAL

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RANCHI

Adv. MR. RATNESH KUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD , HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

16-03-2026

Admission

18-06-2026

Orders

06-05-2026

Admission

17-03-2026

Admission

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY

Case Summary: FA No. 72/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the case to 18.06.2026. The court found that previous service attempts on respondent no. 1 through ordinary mail and speed post were unsuccessful. Consequently, the court ordered that notice be served through the Senior Superintendent of Police, Bokaro, and impleaded the S.P., Ranchi as a party. The court directed the appellant's counsel to serve the appeal memo and required an affidavit confirming service within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FA No. 72/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the case to 18.06.2026. The court found that previous service attempts on respondent no. 1 through ordinary mail and speed post were unsuccessful. Consequently, the court ordered that notice be served through the Senior Superintendent of Police, Bokaro, and impleaded the S.P., Ranchi as a party. The court directed the appellant's counsel to serve the appeal memo and required an affidavit confirming service within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case